Lateral and medial tibial plateau angles in normal dogs

Summary

Objectives

To measure lateral and medial tibial plateau angle values in isolated canine tibiae and to compare lateral and medial tibial plateau angle values between dogs based on sex and breed.

Methods

Tibiae of 90 dogs from 24 different breeds were used. Photographs were taken of the medial and lateral aspects of the tibiae for measurement of the medial and lateral tibial plateau angles. Additionally, the medial tibial plateau angle was measured from radiographs of the tibiae. Two-way analysis of variance was used to test the effects of side, sex and breed on the medial and lateral tibial plateau angles as measured from photographs as well as the medial tibial plateal angles as measured from radiographs. The photographic and radiographic medial tibial plateau angles were compared by paired t-test, whereas the medial and lateral photographic tibial plateau angles were compared by t-test.

Results

When all dogs were included in the analysis, the difference between the mean medial tibial plateau angle (24.0 ± 3.19°) and the mean lateral tibial plateau angle (25.5 ± 3.84°) as measured from photographs was significant (p <0.05). The difference in the photographic medial tibial plateau angle between male and female dogs was significant (p <0.05), whereas the difference in the photographic lateral tibial plateau angle between sexes was not significant. There was a significant difference between the medial and lateral tibial plateau angles as measured from photographs in male dogs (p <0.05) but not in female dogs. Breed comparisons also showed significant differences for the photographic lateral tibial plateau angle (p <0.05).

Clinical significance

The axial rotation of the femoral condyles on the tibial plateau is probably affected by the discrepancy between the medial and lateral tibial plateau angles, and this difference in certain breeds might influence the prevalence of cranial cruciate ligament disease.

Keywords

Lateral plateau angle - dog - medial tibial plateau angle - cranial cruciate ligament

• References

• 1 Dye SF. An evolutionary perspective of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69: 976-983.
• 2 De Rooster H, DeBruin T, Van Bree H. Morphologic and functional features of the canine cruciate ligaments. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 769-780.
• 3 Gupte CM, Bull AM, Murray R. et al. Comparative anatomy of the meniscofemoral ligament in humans and some domestic mammals. Anat Histol Embryol 2007; 36: 47-52.
• 4 Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG. The hindlimb of the carnivores. In Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1987. pp 453-461.
• 5 Evans HE. (1993) Arthrology. In Miller’s Anatomy of the Dog (ed 3). Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1993. pp 219-257.
• 6 Warzee CC, Dejardin LM, Arnoczky SP. et al. Effect of tibial plateau leveling on cranial and caudal tibial thrusts in canine cranial cruciate-deficient stifles: An in vitro experimental study. Vet Surg 2001; 30: 278-286.
• 7 Lopez MJ, Kunz D, Vanderby R. et al. A comparison of joint stability between anterior cruciate intact and deficient knees: a new canine model of anterior cruciate ligament disruption. J Orthop Res 2003; 21: 224-230.
• 8 Tashman S, Anderst W, Kolowich P. et al. Kinematics of the ACL-deficient canine knee during gait: serial changes over two years. J Orthop Res 2004; 22: 931-941.
• 9 O’Brien TR. Development deformities due to arrested epiphyseal growth. Vet Clin North Am 1971; 1: 441-454.
• 10 Read RA, Robins GM. Deformity of the proximal tibia in dog. Vet Rec 1982; 111: 295-298.
• 11 Selmi AL, Padilha Filho JG. Rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament associated with deformity of the proximal tibia in five dogs. J Small Anim Prac 2001; 42: 390-393.
• 12 Osmond CS, Marcellin-Little DJ, Harrysson OLA. et al. Morphometric assessment of the proximal portion of the tibia in dogs with and without cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006; 47: 136-141.
• 13 Griffon DJ. A review of the pathogenesis of canine cranial cruciate ligament disease as a basis for future preventive strategies. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 399-409.
• 14 Slocum B, Devine T. Cranial tibial thrust: A primary force in the canine stifle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1983; 183: 456-459.
• 15 De Rooster H, Van Bree H. Radiographic measurement of craniocaudal instability in stifle joints of clinically normal dogs and dogs with injury of a cranial cruciate ligament. Am J Vet Res 1999; 60: 1567-1570.
• 16 Jerram RM, Walker AM. Cranial cruciate ligament injury in the dog: pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. NZ Vet J 2003; 51: 149-158.
• 17 Liu W, Maitland ME. Influence of anthropometric and mechanical variations on functional instability in the ACL-deficient knee. Ann Biomed Eng 2003; 31: 1153-1161.
• 18 Morris E, Lipowitz AJ. Comparison of tibial plateau angles in dogs with and without cranial cruciate ligament injuries. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001; 218: 363-366.
• 19 Macias C, McKee WM, May C. Caudal proximal tibial deformity and cranial cruciate ligament rupture in small-breed dogs. J Small Anim Prac 2002; 43: 433-438.
• 20 Wilke VL, Conzemius MG, Besencon MF. et al. Comparison of tibial plateau angle between clinically normal Greyhounds and Labrador retrievers with and without rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 221: 1425-1429.
• 21 Reif U, Probst CW. Comparison of tibial plateau angles in normal and cranial cruciate deficient stifles of Labrador retrievers. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 385-389.
• 22 Buote N, Fusco J, Radasch R. Age, tibial plateau angle, sex, and weight as risk factor for contralateral rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in Labradors. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 481-489.
• 23 Shahar R, Milgram J. Biomechanics of tibial plateau leveling of the canine cruciate- deficient stifle joint: A theoretical model. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 144-149.
• 24 Caylor KB, Zumpano CA, Evans LM. et al. Intra- and interobserver measurement variability of tibial plateau slope from lateral radiographs in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2001; 37: 263-268.
• 25 Fettig AA, Rand WM, Sato AF. et al. Observer variability of tibial plateau slope measurement in 40 dogs with cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle joints. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 471-478.
• 26 Baroni E, Matthias RR, Marcellin-Little DJ. et al. Comparison of radiographic assessments of the tibial plateau slope in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2003; 64: 586-589.
• 27 Robinson DA, Mason DR, Evans R. et al. The effect of tibial plateau angle on ground reaction forces 4-17 months after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in Labrador Retrievers. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 294-299.
• 28 Bailey CJ, Smith BA, Black AP. Geometric implications of the tibial wedge osteotomy for the treatment of cranial cruciate ligament disease in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 169-174.
• 29 Conkling AL, Fagin B, Daye RM. Comparison of tibial plateau angle changes after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy fixation with conventional or locking screw technology. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 475-481.
• 30 Hashemi J, Chandrashekar N, Gill B. et al. The geometry of the tibial plateau and its influence on the biomechanics of the tibiofemoral joints. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 2724-2734.
• 31 Stijak L, Herzog RF, Schai P. Is there an influence of the tibial slope of the lateral condyle on the ACL lesion?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16: 112-117.
• 32 Hashemi J, Chandrashekar N, Mansouri H. et al. Shallow medial tibial plateau and steep medial and lateral tibial slopes. New risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38: 54-62.
• 33 Grierson J, Sanders M, Guitan J. et al. Comparison of anatomical tibial plateau angle versus observer measurement from lateral radiographs in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: 215-219.
• 34 Reif U, Dejardin LM, Probst CW. et al. Influence of limb positioning and measurement method on the magnitude of the tibial plateau angle. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 368-375.
• 35 Ritter MJ, Perry RL, Olivier NB. et al. Tibial plateau symmetry and the effect of osteophytosis on tibial plateau angle measurements. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2007; 43: 93-98.
• 36 Ocal MK, Sabanci SS, Onar V. Variation of tibial plateau geometry and cruciate ligament coordinates in six breeds of dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 110-116.
• 37 Unis MD, Johnson AL, Griffon DJ. et al. Evaluation of intra- and interobserver variability and repeatability of tibial plateau angle measurements with digital radiography using a novel digital radiographic program. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 187-194.
• 38 Headrick J, Cook J, Helphrey M. et al. A novel radiographic method to facilitate measurement of the tibial plateau angle in dogs. A prospective clinical study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 24-28.
• 39 Aulakh KS, Harper TAM, Lanz OI. et al. Effect of stifle angle on the magnitude of the tibial plateau angle measurement in dogs with intact and transected cranial cruciate ligament. A cadaveric study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 272-278.
• 40 Etchepareborde S, Mills J, Busoni V. et al. Theoretical discrepancy between cage size and efficient tibial tuberosity advancement in dogs treated for cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 27-31.
• 41 Gatineau M, Dupuis J, Plante J. et al. Retrospective study of 476 tibial plateau levelling osteotomy procedures. Rate of subsequent ‘pivot shift’, meniscal tear and other complications. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 333-341.
• 42 Kowaleski MP, McCarthy RJ. Geometric analysis evaluating the effect of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy position on postoperative tibial plateau slope. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2004; 17: 30-34.
• 43 Odders JW, Jessen CR, Lipowitz AJ. Sequential measurements of the tibial plateau angle in large-breed, growing dogs. Am J Vet Res 2004; 65: 513-518.
• 44 Vezzoni A, Bohorquez Vanelli A, Modenato M. et al. Proximal tibial epiphysiodesis to reduce tibial plateau slope in young dogs with cranial cruciate ligament deficient stifle. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 343-348.
• 45 Whitehair JG, Vasseur PB, Willits NH. Epidemiology of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 203: 1016-1019.
• 46 Duval JM, Budsberg SC, Flo GL. et al. Breed, sex, and body weight as risk factors for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999; 215: 811-814.
• 47 Witsberger TH, Villamil JA, Schultz LG. et al. Prevalence and risk factors for hip dysplasia and cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 232: 1818-1824.
• 48 Adams P, Bolus R, Middleton S. et al. Influence of signalment on developing cranial cruciate rupture in dogs in the UK. J Small Anim Prac 2011; 52: 347-352.
• 49 Guthrie JV, Keeley BJ, Maddock E. et al. Influence of signalment on the presentation of canine patients suffering from cranial cruciate ligament disease. J Small Anim Prac 2012; 53: 273-277.
• 50 Pozzi A, Kowaleski MP, Apelt D. et al. Effect of medial meniscal release on tibial translation after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 486-494.
• 51 Dismukes DI, Tomlinson JL, Fox DB. et al. Radiographic measurement of canine tibial angles in the sagittal plane. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 300-305.
• 52 Mostafa AA, Griffon DJ, Thomas M. et al. Morphometric characteristics of the pelvic limb of Labrador Retrievers with and without cranial cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Vet Res 2009; 70: 498-507.
• 53 Ragetly CA, Evans R, Mostafa AA. et al. Multivariate analysis of morphometric characteristics to evaluate risk factors for cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in Labrador Retrievers. Vet Surg 2011; 40: 327-333.
• 54 Priddy NH, Tomlinson JL, Dodam JR. et al. Complications with and owner assessment of outcome of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: 193 cases (1997-2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 222: 1726-1732.
• 55 Grierson J, Asher L, Grainger K. An investigation into risk factors for bilateral canine cruciate ligament rupture. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 192-196.
• 56 McLean SG, Lucey SM, Rohrer S. et al. Knee joint anatomy predicts high-risk in vivo dynamic landing knee biomechanics. Clin Biomech 2010; 25: 781-788.
• 57 David FH, Grierson J, Lamb JR. Reducing susceptibility artefacts in magnetic resonance images of the canine stifle following surgery for cranial cruciate ligament deficiency. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25: 488-497.